Joerg Schilling wrote: > Darren J Moffat <Darren.Moffat at Sun.COM> wrote: > >> April Chin wrote: >>> An update from the project team on the pfksh93 issue... >>> >>> Although some ideas on disabling built-ins for pfksh93 >>> has been proposed, the team has agreed to remove pfksh93 from the case, >>> so we can investigate the correct solution carefully in a future case, >>> without impeding this case. >>> >>> I will remove mention of pfksh93 and the -P and -o profile >>> options from the proposed ksh93.1 and other manpages in the case materials. >> Thanks I'm happy with that outcome. Project team please seek the help >> of the security community rather than trying to work this out on your >> own. You can reach us at security-discuss at opensolaris.org > > If you remove pfhsh93, you make ksh93 a second class citizen > and gives a bad start for ksh93. Don't do that, rather solve the problems.
but until the ksh93 source becomes the source of /usr/bin/ksh it is already a second class citizen. It isn't a never it is a not for the first integration. -- Darren J Moffat