Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Darren J Moffat <Darren.Moffat at Sun.COM> wrote:
> 
>> April Chin wrote:
>>> An update from the project team on the pfksh93 issue...
>>>
>>> Although some ideas on disabling built-ins for pfksh93
>>> has been proposed, the team has agreed to remove pfksh93 from the case,
>>> so we can investigate the correct solution carefully in a future case,
>>> without impeding this case.  
>>>
>>> I will remove mention of pfksh93 and the -P and -o profile 
>>> options from the proposed ksh93.1 and other manpages in the case materials.
>> Thanks I'm happy with that outcome.  Project team please seek the help 
>> of the security community rather than trying to work this out on your 
>> own.  You can reach us at security-discuss at opensolaris.org
> 
> If you remove pfhsh93, you make ksh93 a second class citizen
> and gives a bad start for ksh93. Don't do that, rather solve the problems.

but until the ksh93 source becomes the source of /usr/bin/ksh it is 
already a second class citizen.  It isn't a never it is a not for the 
first integration.


-- 
Darren J Moffat

Reply via email to