James Carlson <james.d.carlson at Sun.COM> wrote:
> Casper.Dik at Sun.COM writes:
> > >However, unless there were some _extremely_ compelling reason to do
> > >so, I'd be unlikely to be in favor of the sort of blanket ban you seem
> > >to be suggesting. Development in Solaris isn't a matter of famous
> > >personalities, and we don't have kings who get the final say in
> > >particular areas. Instead, it's about the technology.
> >
> > But in some sense, James, such a "blanket ban" exists. Any change of
> > the behaviour of a program needs to go through ARC, C-team review, etc.
>
> That's not what Mr. Schilling seemed to be requesting. He was
> specifically asking to have a current project team be told that they
> must have their plans OK'd by the author of some future project.
NO, I am not talking about a _future_ project but about a project that has
already been accepted in the past.
J?rg
--
EMail:joerg at schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js at cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
