Jim Walker wrote: > Mark Martin wrote: >> Please find attached (and text inline) the draft opinion for 2008/772 >> Command Assistant. Commentary, concerns, criticisms, and corrections >> wanted. Please. >> _ >> >> Project Private: >> /usr/lib/commandassistant/CommnadAssistant.jar >> /usr/lib/commandassistant/lib/jaxb-api.jar >> /usr/lib/commandassistant/lib/sjsxp.jar >> /usr/lib/commandassistant/lib/jsr173_api.jar >> /usr/lib/commandassistant/lib/jaxws-api.jar >> /usr/lib/commandassistant/lib/jsr250-api.jar >> /usr/lib/commandassistant/lib/FastInfoset.jar >> /usr/lib/commandassistant/lib/jaxb-xjc.jar >> /usr/lib/commandassistant/lib/streambuffer.jar >> /usr/lib/commandassistant/lib/jaxws-rt.jar >> /usr/lib/commandassistant/lib/http.jar >> /usr/lib/commandassistant/lib/saaj-api.jar >> /usr/lib/commandassistant/lib/jsr181-api.jar >> /usr/lib/commandassistant/lib/jaxws-tools.jar >> /usr/lib/commandassistant/lib/saaj-impl.jar >> /usr/lib/commandassistant/lib/stax-ex.jar >> /usr/lib/commandassistant/lib/jaxb-impl.jar >> /usr/lib/commandassistant/lib/activation.jar >>
Also, does this account for the fact that most if not all of these are separate FOSS projects with various licensing? I think it is better to port these separately then combine them like Drools LSARC/2008/748 did. Cheers, Jim
