Joseph Kowalski wrote: > Ken Erickson wrote: >> We still need 2 packages, because one will contain the usr/sbin/rmt >> binary, /etc/rmt symlink, and we >> also still need the (private) shared library. It seems wrong to put >> these things in the same package >> with star, especially when we will most likely include them in >> different product clusters. > Nit: don't we need more than two packages because of the root/usr > separation? > > "/usr/sbin/rmt binary, /etc/rmt symlink" > > Yea, I know its a pain. > > - jek3 > dsc just pointed that out also. Per my reply to him, I think we can leave the symlink in SUNWrcmdr and just add a package dependency there, on our new package.
Other existing packages have cross-consolidation dependencies, so this is not setting a precedent. -- Ken Erickson | kene at Eng.Sun.COM Sun Microsystems, Inc., Solaris OS Engineering | Voice: (847)663-9471 4150 Network Circle MS UITA01 | Cell: (847)530-4603 Santa Clara, CA 95054 | If you want me to read something, don't send it as a StarOffice or HTML attachment.
