Ken Erickson wrote: > We still need 2 packages, because one will contain the usr/sbin/rmt > binary, /etc/rmt symlink, and we > also still need the (private) shared library. It seems wrong to put > these things in the same package > with star, especially when we will most likely include them in > different product clusters. Nit: don't we need more than two packages because of the root/usr separation?
"/usr/sbin/rmt binary, /etc/rmt symlink"
Yea, I know its a pain.
- jek3
