Garrett D'Amore wrote: > Ewww. > > Since things seem to be headed there anyway, wouldn't it make more > sense to just integrate Joerg's rmt into ON? I think at the end of > the day (after running all the cases that seem to be in the offing), > it will ultimately result in fewer weird cross-consolidation > dependencies. > > -- Garrett +1
But that is advice to Ken/Jeorg. Just advice. Nothing more. - jek3
