James Carlson wrote:
> Norm Jacobs writes:
>
>> to accommodate the realities of today. Given what I am trying to
>> acheive, perhaps "Uncommitted Obsolete" would be more appropriate.
>>
>
> This is just a minor nit, but I'd suggest using "Obsolete Committed."
> "Obsolete Uncommitted" is possible, but doesn't really make much
> sense. It means that we don't want people to use it (it's obsolete)
> but that we're likely to make incompatible changes to it in the
> future.
>
> Other than removal (which is what "obsolete" already implies), what
> incompatible changes would we bother making in an interface we're
> going to tear down anyway? Such interfaces typically don't evolve in
> any meaningful way; they just get removed over time
Ok, I propose that cups-config be "Obsolete Committed" and I add a new
.pc file /usr/lib/pkgconfig/cups.pc that I will designate as
Uncommitted. That should address both your and Garrett's issues.
-Norm
