> Thanks for the answers. +1 on the case, with the added comment (for the > record), that it might be a good idea to research the possibility of > providing trunking/aggregation similar features over IB links. I'd also > like to see snoop and statistic support on the phys link in the near > future; I hope that is actively planned for a follow-up, and not just a > hypothetical "we can do it if we want to" sort of thing.
I agree the observability/statistic support would be valuable. The high-order bit here is that the proposed architecture allows such as thing to be built, whereas the existing Solaris architecture does not since there is no datalink object associated with the physical port. -- meem
