> On a related note, the materials don't explicitly state the case > dependencies, but I believe this case has a dependency on PSARC > 2007/429. Pulling on that case's string, the sweater that would need to > get backported into a patch gets quickly unraveled. ;-)
An excellent point, and one that I'm embarrased to admit I overlooked when considering the S10 aspects of this case. Further, this case is dependent on a massive number of other Nevada-only projects, going all the way back to Clearview Vanity Naming and the Devname Project. That is, I think any practical possibility of backporting this particular solution to S10 is dead in the water. > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > | InfiniBand Specific Link Properties | > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > | linkmode | ON Consolidation Private | > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Given that it's Consolidation Private, I take it that this is a private > property (as defined by 2007/429). I was under the impression that > private properties had to be prefixed by a '_' character as required by > the Brussels framework. Is that not the case? I think this is just an error in the interface table; `linkmode' is intended to be a Committed property for IB links, hence its inclusion into the dladm manpage Sudhakar provided. -- meem
