On 03/12/10 06:47 PM, Ted Kim wrote: >> One point of minor confusion for me is that you have another ongoing >> PSARC case that overlaps this one (PSARC 2009/365). I can guess that >> you intended this case to supersede that one, but can you please make >> that explicit here? If that's indeed the case, please close 2009/365 >> appropriately. > > Good point. I will say for the record > that you are correct about the intention. > This case was meant to supercede the older one. > I will clean up the old one and close/withdraw it. > > To be honest, I have never had to do that before, > so if there is a specific way to resolve this which > you would want to see, please tell me.
The most appropriate thing to do would be to close that case by changing its status in the IAM file as "closed superseded 2010/085". Thanks, -Seb P.S.: Of my original email message, there is still one outstanding question regarding the validity of the release binding.
