Okay I closed PSARC/2009/365 as superseded by this one. Didn't forget about your other question. I or Sudhakar will get answer for you.
-ted Sebastien Roy wrote: > On 03/12/10 06:47 PM, Ted Kim wrote: >>> One point of minor confusion for me is that you have another ongoing >>> PSARC case that overlaps this one (PSARC 2009/365). I can guess that >>> you intended this case to supersede that one, but can you please make >>> that explicit here? If that's indeed the case, please close 2009/365 >>> appropriately. >> >> Good point. I will say for the record >> that you are correct about the intention. >> This case was meant to supercede the older one. >> I will clean up the old one and close/withdraw it. >> >> To be honest, I have never had to do that before, >> so if there is a specific way to resolve this which >> you would want to see, please tell me. > > The most appropriate thing to do would be to close that case by changing > its status in the IAM file as "closed superseded 2010/085". > > Thanks, > -Seb > > P.S.: Of my original email message, there is still one outstanding > question regarding the validity of the release binding. -- Ted H. Kim, PhD Sun/Oracle America Inc. ted.kim at sun.com 222 North Sepulveda Blvd., 10th Floor (310) 341-1116 El Segundo, CA 90245 (310) 341-1115 FAX
