>On 18/03/2010 16:38, Garrett D'Amore wrote: >> On 03/18/10 09:28 AM, Casper.Dik at Sun.COM wrote: >>> >>>> Architecturally, I have to agree with Darren here. I don't know what >>>> the concerns are here where this would fail to operate with the current >>>> pfexec... I thought that it was just the case that pfexec would bypass >>>> the builtin and use the filesystem supplied binary. >>> That is not currently the case and "pfsh" in OpenSolaris doesn't work as >>> OpenSolaris did for the builtins. I'm hoping to fix that by making sure >>> we ignore the builtin commands in profile shells. (By default and as only >>> option inside of a profile shell) >>> >>> >>> Casper >>> >> >> This sounds like a showstopper for this case then. > >This case doesn't make the current situation worse. I also now >understand that isn't really that relevant to this case anyway because >this is all about when /usr/gnu/bin is first in your path and about >providing builtins for that. Since we have no /usr/gnu/bin entries in >exec_attr anyway there is no issue with pfexec and this case.
I agree with Darren (assuming there are no profiles with now builtin GNU commands) Casper
