On 03/18/10 09:41 AM, Darren J Moffat wrote:
>
>
> On 18/03/2010 16:38, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>> On 03/18/10 09:28 AM, Casper.Dik at Sun.COM wrote:
>>>
>>>> Architecturally, I have to agree with Darren here. I don't know what
>>>> the concerns are here where this would fail to operate with the 
>>>> current
>>>> pfexec... I thought that it was just the case that pfexec would bypass
>>>> the builtin and use the filesystem supplied binary.
>>> That is not currently the case and "pfsh" in OpenSolaris doesn't 
>>> work as
>>> OpenSolaris did for the builtins. I'm hoping to fix that by making sure
>>> we ignore the builtin commands in profile shells. (By default and as 
>>> only
>>> option inside of a profile shell)
>>>
>>>
>>> Casper
>>>
>>
>> This sounds like a showstopper for this case then.
>
> This case doesn't make the current situation worse. I also now 
> understand that isn't really that relevant to this case anyway because 
> this is all about when /usr/gnu/bin is first in your path and about 
> providing builtins for that.  Since we have no /usr/gnu/bin entries in 
> exec_attr anyway there is no issue with pfexec and this case.
>

Thanks for the clarification.  So, this particular objection is removed.

     - Garrett

Reply via email to