Hi, Alan Coopersmith p??e v ?t 23. 03. 2010 v 00:24 -0700: > Milan Jurik wrote: > > You ignored the rest of the e-mail, skipping arguments. Yes, you can > > consider those arguments as non-sense but it is fair to say it openly in > > discussion. > > Because it's still pointless. No amount of arguments will add up to > making it worthwhile or likely that /usr/gnu/bin/ls is removed from > the system and the debate about the PATH order has happened elsewhere. > > If you want to waste your time arguing, that's your choice, but it's > not going to change anything. >
OK, I accept. The discussion is over, the decision was made. And yes, the discussion, which is about system architecture, did not happen on architecture committee. Best regards, Milan
