Thanks for the support Eric!

I believe we can make the right choice and remain organized and consistent at 
the same time.  I also believe the right choice is a community for my needs, 
according to Stephen's criteria which I used in my assessment.

I never intended to justify a decision due to other past decisions, I meant to 
say that organization is a good justification.

I hope this clears up any misunderstanding.

Mark Sweeney

----- Original Message -----
From: Eric Schrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, January 19, 2006 4:49 pm
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Re: CIFS group creation request.
To: Mark Sweeney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

> On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 04:34:57PM -0500, Mark Sweeney wrote:
> > 
> > I want to host a community which already exists, the 'CIFS 
> community',> on the OpenSolaris website.  I want to do this since 
> we have several
> > implementations that work on Solaris of CIFS already and especially
> > since there is a native OpenSolaris client coming out, which has 
> been> wanted for some time.  Going to  google and typing 'CIFS 
> community' as
> > a search will show you some results of where the CIFS community
> > members lurk for other operating systems or for specific
> > cross-platform implementations.
> >
> > If ZFS, and indeed, all the FS's may migrate to being projects in a
> > Filesystems community at some point then that's fine.  Until 
> then, I
> > would prefer to keep things consistent and organized, and we can 
> move> them all together.  A lack of consistency in organization 
> would bother
> > me.
> 
> I have no qualms about creating a CIFS community, and have no strong
> opinion on the overall direction of this request.  While there may be
> dozens of other reasons for creating a community over a project, I was
> only pointing out that the above, specific, rationale is broken and
> inadequate.  Do not use "lack of consistency" as justification for
> making the wrong choice.
> 
> Stephen gave precise criteria for establishing a community versus a
> project.  Don't use existing communities as justification, since by
> nature they did not have to address these questions at the time they
> were created.  "Because ZFS did it" or "it would be inconsistent with
> UFS" are not valid reasons, nor should the establishment of a 
> FilesystemCommunity be a prerequesite for making a CIFS project.
> 
> - Eric
> 
> --
> Eric Schrock, Solaris Kernel Development       
> http://blogs.sun.com/eschrock
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Reply via email to