On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 06:57:32PM -0500, Eric Boutilier wrote: > On Wed, 30 May 2007, Keith M Wesolowski wrote: > >On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:41:52AM +1200, Glynn Foster wrote: > > > >The process requires that this be sent to one or more community groups > >for sponsorship consideration... > > I don't agree. Here's how I'd put it: "The almost-but-not-quite-yet OGB > blessed project instantiation draft proposal will require > that this be sent... etc."
It was approved in the public and open April 25th meeting, the minutes of which reflect that approval and were posted as required. Subsequent feedback is a basis for modifying the policy; it is not a barrier to its implementation. No one read the final document and the minutes and said "This is not the policy we approved; a new vote is needed." We simply cannot allow cycles of feedback, however constructive and worthwhile, to delay indefinitely the adoption and implementation of a policy that has already been approved in accordance with the Constitution. In short: The policy was approved by the OGB and that approval was communicated to the community in accordance with the Constitution. It is in effect, and project teams are expected to follow it. -- Keith M Wesolowski "Sir, we're surrounded!" FishWorks "Excellent; we can attack in any direction!" _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
