On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 03:50:07AM -0500, Eric Boutilier wrote: > Twice this month, for the creation of new projects, I posted > the following: > > "Also copying OGB... FYI, we're moving ahead with with the setup of this > project under the old process. The 2-business-day discussion period has > been satisfied, it has sponsorship of the [sponsoring community] and > has been seconded." > > Your and the other members' non-response contributed (really > badly, IMO) to the confusion.
What response should we have made? Although our Constitution doesn't explicitly preclude it, common sense says we shouldn't make ex post facto policies. So if someone proposed a project before the new policy came into effect, what are we supposed to say when it times out? "No, don't do that; you have to go follow this new thing that didn't exist"? Talk about bureaucratic runaround. -- Keith M Wesolowski "Sir, we're surrounded!" FishWorks "Excellent; we can attack in any direction!" _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
