On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 20:13 -0700, Alan DuBoff wrote: > On Fri, 7 Sep 2007, Kaiwai Gardiner wrote: > > > Actually, if Sun played it in such a way, Sun would look like the > > victim, AMD would look like the irresponsible partner, and the only > one > > who would truly come out worse would be AMD - as AMD partners would > > question the basis of any relationship with them. > > I don't know...seems that when you're playing CEO on the internet, > you > could toss them some chump change and open that relationship, so both > Sun > and AMD came out looking like heros. No? > > After all, it's the internet, can't we just make it end how we > want?;-)
Yeah, and the current situation has worked sooooooooo well so far. How long did it take for Sun to realise that SPARC isn't the be all and end all? when their share price plumited to 1/10th? when management finally woke up from their opium hazed existance and realised that they alone should have their hands on the steering wheel rather than allowing the noisy bratts at the back to gain control? Matthew _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
