On Feb 6, 2008 12:49 PM, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Sorry, but unless you are able to explain problems, I ned to asume that > > > you > > > don't know what you are talking about. > > > > > > Why should sh have problems with "certain terminals"? > > > > > > What do you understand by "locale support". > > > > > > Writing unspecified claims does not allow to have a fact based discussion. > > > > Joerg, look at the bug database. It is pointless for me to restate > > bugs that have already been recorded. > > If you cannot name bug id's we need to stop here and conclude there are no > problems with sh.
Didn't you reprimand someone the other day for not reading the SchilliX readme? The tools are available for you to find the bugs if you want to see them. It took me all of a few moments to put together these searches: http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/search.do?process=1&type=bug&sortBy=relevance&bugStatus=1-dispatched&perPage=10&bugId=&keyword=&textSearch=&category=shell&subcategory=bourne&since= http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/search.do?process=1&type=bug&sortBy=relevance&bugStatus=3-accepted&perPage=10&bugId=&keyword=&textSearch=&category=shell&subcategory=bourne&since= ... I could go on, but what would be the point? There are at least 60-70 bugs that I've found just looking through those pages. -- Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/ "To err is human -- and to blame it on a computer is even more so." - Robert Orben _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
