Martin Bochnig wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Calum Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> 
> 
>     On 20 Oct 2008, at 23:40, Martin Bochnig wrote:
> 
>      > On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:16 AM, Calum Benson
>      > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>      >
>      >>
>      >> On 19 Oct 2008, at 13:11, Duncan Paterson wrote:
>      >>
>      >>> What are the chances that this will one day rival apt for
>     selection,
>      >>> frequency of updates and speed.
>      >>
>      >> It will happen a lot quicker once we have repositories in place to
>      >> which everyone can contribute packages.  I get the feeling
>     that'll be
>      >> a pretty high priority once 2008.11 is out the door, and with a bit
>      >> of
>      >> luck it'll be in full swing in time for the 2009.04 release.
> 
>      > Not necessary, because by then users can do the same thing in a
>      > better way
>      > (more sophisticated, but complexity encapsulated from users) via the
>      > then
>      > available conary-based version of Indiana.
> 
>     Which is fine, but just because you consider it unnecessary doesn't
>     mean it isn't going to happen :)
> 
>     Cheeri,
>     Calum.
> 
>     --
>     CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer       Sun Microsystems Ireland
>     mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>          
>      GNOME Desktop Team
>     http://blogs.sun.com/calum             +353 1 819 977
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Oh, ditto.
> 
> But think twice: If Sun likes to pay tons of money for re-inventing the 
> wheel only to come into a position, where they can say "we made this, it 
> is our little kindergarden invention", rather than having licensed 
> rPath's conary in the first place (which is in busy development since 
> 2004), then go ahead and waste more TIME, more MANPOWER, more MONEY and 
> more other RESOURCES.
> I doubt your primary interest is to HELP CUSTOMERS increase their 
> PRODUCTIVITY.
> 

Sigh.  Martin, this is becoming tedious.  I think all of us  involved 
with packaging acknowledge that Conary has a fine product, but it didn't 
meet the requirements that we had identified for Sun's businesses.  We 
wish you well in packaging up your distro.

Dave

_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Reply via email to