Short response: what you've got is inapt comparison, compounded by a lack of interest in a level of detail that makes for meaningful analysis or tenable conclusions (e.g. someone updates a long-standing bug ticket, where it isn't clear that the original issue is a bug in the first instance or that the updates are at all the same thing, without providing the basic information required adequately to substantiate or characterise the problem, where you, ignoring such basic considerations, first unfairly question the professionalism of the VirtualBox developers and then go on to suggest that OpenSolaris should emulate their release practices). I've no interest in further feeding your trolling.
On 6 Jul 2010, at 14:25, Gary wrote: > I'd say someone having a problem on May 30, 2010 makes it a still relevant > problem since they tried VT-x (with/out). There was also a problem in Feb, > 2010, same issue. > > The post was also more to the point that if OpenSolaris isn't being released > because of bugs, then what is the keeping OpenSolaris from being released? I > mean they release VirtualBox with so many releases one can't keep up. The > VirtualBox releases are due mostly to bug fixes. > > If they can release a product with so many bugs like VirtualBox, then why not > release a bug-ridden OpenSolaris? > -- > This message posted from opensolaris.org > _______________________________________________ > opensolaris-discuss mailing list > opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
