Your characterisation here is just as inapt and indifferent to basic distinctions as anything else you've had to say on this matter. Anyone who wants to know about VirtualBox bug reporting guidelines can look here:
http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Bugtracker Anyone who wants to know about the ticket, including my update, which, after asking for the log info specified in the guidelines, suggests that it be closed if the minimum requisite information for problem analysis isn't forthcoming or if it turns out to be a different problem, can look here: http://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/639 I think I've already indulged your trolling too far as it is, so unless you're prepared to concede that you've got absolutely no reason to follow up your series of baseless aspersions and meandering rants with charging me with "sheer stupidity", I trust I can leave it at that. On 6 Jul 2010, at 16:03, Gary wrote: > There was plenty of information in the 05/30/2010 VirtualBox ticket. Yet, > your update to the ticket is to have them close it, specifically, when a > problem hasn't been addressed? > > That was a real technical update too. Close it. Sheer stupidity on your > part. > -- > This message posted from opensolaris.org > _______________________________________________ > opensolaris-discuss mailing list > opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
