On 16 Aug 2010, at 12:54, Gabriele Bulfon wrote: > Why should one consider that source trustable? > What if another FUDding writer had fun putting this online? > Again, nothing have been said directly by Oracle. > And, afterall, we're all still posting at opensolaris.org
1. The source it was obtained from has no reason to lie 2. The statement is in line with Oracle's behaviour/announcements to date. 3. To manufacture a statement of that length and quality would require considerable effort. It's highly unlikely it's a fake. 4. Not a single Oracle staff member has denied the memo, quite the contrary: http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-discuss/2010-August/059316.html However you're correct, it's not an official statement by Oracle. So if you wish to pretend you haven't seen it, go right ahead ;-) _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
