agree to disagree yea but then your days are numbered in SL. If the project forks then there will be a VW without all these restrictions and lindens threatening people for asking them to keep their promises?
On 3/14/10, New Hax <newh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I want a grid where people can have the freedom to develop what they > want and do what they want, without being told whats allowed, and > without being watched because you might move the wrong bits from one > place to another. and without lindens threatening if we dont "play > nice" with draconinan DRM. That was what i hoped the spirit of Open > source SL would be. but i guess im wrong. > > > On 3/14/10, Glen Canaday <gcana...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Then what are you doing here? >> >> On 03/14/2010 06:32 PM, New Hax wrote: >>> I know better than to try to get rich off of selling ones and zeroes. >>> >>> On 3/14/10, Glen Canaday<gcana...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Then what are you doing in SL? Not making a living, I can assure you. >>>> >>>> Nor are you putting food on the table RL except perhaps by manual >>>> labor, >>>> which cannot be copied. Ex: Ditches need to be dug. The ditch-digger >>>> can >>>> be changed out, but that doesn't change the fact that even if you get a >>>> new digger, you still have a ditch when you're done. >>>> >>>> OSS/Free Software and Proprietary software are the diggers; they're not >>>> the ditch itself. >>>> >>>> On 03/14/2010 06:18 PM, New Hax wrote: >>>> >>>>> then what are you doing on an opensource list if you want your content >>>>> wrapped in DRM. >>>>> >>>>> sl will die if its not open. and you can't compare rl doors to the >>>>> internet. if you dont lock your rl door I can come in and take >>>>> something of yours that isnt replaceable. >>>>> >>>>> but on the internet as a content maker you can make INFINITE products >>>>> so you arent losing anything if i copy it and make no money off of it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 3/14/10, Marine Kelley<marinekel...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> well I am a content creator, content theft is a problem to me, it is >>>>>> tied >>>>>> to >>>>>> IP rights which are a legal issue. And I am not one of those who say >>>>>> "content theft is inevitable, let's not do anything about it". Doors >>>>>> can >>>>>> be >>>>>> lock picked, that's not a reason for me to leave my door wide open. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 14 March 2010 23:04, New Hax<newh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 3/14/10, Marine Kelley<marinekel...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Err... Content theft has always been a problem, will always be a >>>>>>>> problem, >>>>>>>> and LL better be on the same page with developers, content makers >>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>> customers here. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> content theft isn't a problem, never has been a problem, and is the >>>>>>> nature of the internet and digital things. if content makers are >>>>>>> worried about content "theft" then they shouldn't be on SL. because >>>>>>> its inevitable and cant be stopped. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: >>>>> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev >>>>> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting >>>>> privileges >>>>> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: >>>> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev >>>> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting >>>> privileges >>>> >>>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: >> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev >> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting >> privileges >> > _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges