[jaenicke - Mon Jun 10 17:42:40 2002]:
> I have made some further modifications: I did not like the direct use
> of
> 2 23 42 for SET (even though correct of course) but wanted to build
> the
> tree from the root.
> While doing this I noted, that the CCITT has long since been renamed
> to ITU-T.
> I therefore made some additional changes to use the new name and
> prepare
> aliases for CCITT.
> * It should be no problem to apply this to 0.9.8.
> * I am afraid to break things beyond NID_uniqueIdentifier in 0.9.7.
> (Due to
> the alias for CCITT nothing should happen, though).
Ok, I have checked in the SET stuff for 0.9.7 and later.
I have left out any CCITT->ITU-T renaming for now and will move
this ticket with a new subject to the 0.9.8 queue.
Best regards,
Lutz
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
