Test complete, 0.9.6e-dev went through without any problems.
I'll see if I can find the delivered libraries again and try to reinstall them and see what effect that has on it all. [levitte - Tue Jul 16 12:31:37 2002]: > Note that Apple delivers OpenSSL 0.9.6b, so it may be that the > differences are few enough not to trigger much problems, apparently > with RC4 being the great exception. Actually, even this shouldn't > be a problem, if it weren't for some binary incompatibilities > between (I think) 0.9.6c and 0.9.6d... > > I just tested OpenSSL 0.9.8-dev on MacOSX 5.5 with the delivered > libcrypto.dylib and libssl.dylib removed, and it had no trouble at > all. I'm about to test 0.9.6e-dev (which doesn't differ from 0.9.6d > at all when it comes to RC4). > > I assume we're still talking about 0.9.6d, right? > > [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Jul 16 06:09:37 2002]: > > > At 7:55 AM -0700 15/7/02, Doug Kaufman wrote: > > >I don't have a Mac, but I took the liberty of forwarding the > trouble > > >report to Chris Roberts, who compiles and packages openssl for the > > >OSXGNU project. I am appending the reply. Does adding the linker > > >option "-flatnamespace" fix the problem for those with Macs? > > > > It doesn't appear to be a linking problem since all the other > tests > > are successful (even when you use "make -k test" to get past the > rc4 > > test) which I would expect would have failed if it was a linking > > problem. Therefore I suspect it is something in the code for RC4 > > function. > > > > Mark. > > > -- Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED] ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
