Politeness is always better, especially in deadend conversations, like
those, you know, you're wrong ! no it's you who is wrong !
Althoug I'll be tempted to think that MS is particullary good at this.
:)

Well I hope MS will be able to get into an adult argumentation, I think it's
mostly about the comprehension of the RFC, since it's really not clear the
way IETF expresses it.
The best solution would be that one of you big people, contact IETF, about
the RFC comprehension, at least that would quit any kind of linguistic
argumentation.

Imagine, the headlines in every journal of the world:
"Microsoft is proved, by the OpenSSL community, to be unable to understand
english !"

WARFWARFWARF !

Sorry, I had a stressfull day.



----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 5:09 PM
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #323] Bug in "authorityKeyIdentifier" extension ?


> In message <03f201c28a97$38a075d0$0200a8c0@station1> on Tue, 12 Nov 2002
23:02:41 +0100, Frédéric Giudicelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> groups> I'm guessing that M$ is wrong, that would not be the first time,
howerver
> groups> the real question now, is how do you contact M$, the report the
bug, the guy
> groups> I was in contact with, is:
> groups> "krish shenoy[MS]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> groups> He claims that M$ is right, I guess I'll let you big guys convince
them !
>
> I was very close to saying "tough for them" and ignoring the whole
> thing.  But then I changed my mind, and mailed that fellow.  I was
> even polite :-).
>
> In the mean time, I'll kill the ticket if it hasn't already been done.
>
> --
> Richard Levitte   \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Redakteur@Stacken  \ S-168 35  BROMMA  \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
>                     \      SWEDEN       \ or +46-708-26 53 44
> Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis                -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
>
> Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
> See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
>
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to