I did not bother to check the performance, just because it is obvious that it is more time, and even if it is not a lot, why not be better while I know that performance is a major issue on our system.
Any way, thank you every one, who participated on this thread. On 1/31/06, Lev Walkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Joe Gluck wrote: > > 1. I don't expect any thing developed specilay for me, I was just > > wondering if there is any one out there that knew about a function > > that already exists and does it. > > > > 2. I am not designing a system to break in 10 years, I am thinking of > > better performance for the time until we need to find a better > > solution. > > Have you measured that performance and found the simple string > comparison (coupled with optional parsing) to be the main contention > point in your application? > > Have you used profiler to confirm your performance suspicions? > > If not, please do. You'll be thoroughly surprized. > > > BTW why will I run into trouble at 2015 it should be good up to 2037? > > Am I missing some thing? > > In 2015 there will be certificates which will break in 2037, like > now there are these which break in 2015. > > > Thanks, > > > > Joe > > > > On 1/31/06, David Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> I will not get certificates today for after 2045 because the > >>> certificates that I am checking are certificates that already past a > >>> validation check and have been inserted into my cache system, therefor > >>> it is a certificate signed by our own system which does not sign for > >>> more then 25 year. most are 1 year. > >>> > >>> Thanks Joe > >> You may have a special case, but you can't expect the library to be > >> designed for your special case. You'll run into trouble after 2015 anyway > >> -- > >> any special reason you're designing things to break in 10 years? > >> > >> DS > >> > >> > >> ______________________________________________________________________ > >> OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > >> Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org > >> Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > > Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org > > Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org > Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
