Hello Steven,

> The following looks ok to me (but so did the previous stuff):
The difference is noticeable. This one works perfect for me too :)
Thank you very much...
It would be good if Richard could merge this into the tests.com file.

Regards, 
Z

-----Original Message-----
From: Steven M. Schweda [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: den 27 januari 2010 22:13
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta5 release v. VMS

From: Arpadffy Zoltan <[email protected]>

> Could you please write that DEFINE/NOLOG SSLROOT [...]

   _You_'re the one with all the "000000" stuff, so I thought that I
could get _you_ to do it.  Sigh.  The following looks ok to me (but so
did the previous stuff):

$
$       set default '__here'
$       set default [-.apps]
$       sslroot = f$parse( f$environment( "default"), , , ,
"no_conceal")
$       sslroot = sslroot - "][" - ".000000" - "].;" + ".]"
$       define /translation_attributes = concealed sslroot 'sslroot'
$       set default '__here'
$


   By the way, building on HP-UX and Solaris, I noticed thet the JPAKE
stuff is "experimental", and not included in the builds by default. 
And, if it is included, the test fails in the same way.  If it really
doesn't work, then perhaps it should be excluded from the VMS build. 
(Or done last.)

------------------------------------------------------------------------

   Steven M. Schweda               s...@antinode-info
   382 South Warwick Street        (+1) 651-699-9818
   Saint Paul  MN  55105-2547
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [email protected]
Automated List Manager                           [email protected]

 
 
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [email protected]
Automated List Manager                           [email protected]

Reply via email to