> -----Original Message----- > From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com] > Sent: 07 April 2014 19:12 > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Server Groups are not an optional > element, bug or feature ? > > ... > I consider it a complete working feature. It makes sense to enable the > filters > by default. It's harmless when the API isn't used. That was just an > oversight. > > The list of instances in a group through the API only shows non-deleted > instances.
True, but the lack of even a soft delete on the rows in the instance_group_member worries me - its not clear why that wasn't fixed rather than just hiding the deleted instances. I'd of expected the full DB lifecycle to implemented before something was considered as a complete working feature. > > There are some implementation details that could be improved (the check > on the server is the big one). > > -- > Russell Bryant > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
