On 10 April 2014 02:32, Chris Friesen <[email protected]> wrote: > On 04/09/2014 03:45 AM, Day, Phil wrote: >>> >>> -----Original Message----- From: Russell Bryant > > >>> We were thinking that there may be a use for being able to query a >>> full list of instances (including the deleted ones) for a group. >>> The API just hasn't made it that far yet. Just hiding them for now >>> leaves room to iterate and doesn't prevent either option (exposing >>> the deleted instances, or changing to auto- delete them from the >>> group). > > >> Maybe it's just me, but I have a natural aversion to anything that >> grows forever in the database - over time and at scale this becomes a >> real problem. > > > Not just you. I want my main database to reflect the current active data. > Historical data should go somewhere else.
+1. Fastest way to make an OLTP workload crawl is to mix it up with warehousing. -Rob -- Robert Collins <[email protected]> Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
