On 04/09/2014 10:45 AM, Robert Collins wrote: > On 10 April 2014 02:32, Chris Friesen <chris.frie...@windriver.com> wrote: >> On 04/09/2014 03:45 AM, Day, Phil wrote: >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- From: Russell Bryant >> >> >>>> We were thinking that there may be a use for being able to query a >>>> full list of instances (including the deleted ones) for a group. >>>> The API just hasn't made it that far yet. Just hiding them for now >>>> leaves room to iterate and doesn't prevent either option (exposing >>>> the deleted instances, or changing to auto- delete them from the >>>> group). >> >> >>> Maybe it's just me, but I have a natural aversion to anything that >>> grows forever in the database - over time and at scale this becomes a >>> real problem. >> >> >> Not just you. I want my main database to reflect the current active data. >> Historical data should go somewhere else. > > +1. Fastest way to make an OLTP workload crawl is to mix it up with > warehousing.
I do not disagree. -- Russell Bryant _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
