On 21 October 2015 at 10:29, Kyle Mestery <mest...@mestery.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Armando M. <arma...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On 21 October 2015 at 09:53, Kyle Mestery <mest...@mestery.com> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Armando M. <arma...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 21 October 2015 at 04:12, Gal Sagie <gal.sa...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Do we also want to consider Project Kuryr part of this? >>>>> >>>> >>>> No, why would we? >>>> >>>> >>> The reason to consider it is because Kuryr is a sub-project of Neutron, >>> and they are doing their spec submissions following the Neutron guidelines. >>> Adding the kuryr-core gerrit group to be on part with the *aas repos makes >>> sense here. If other sub-projects (like L2FW, SFC, etc.) start doing spec >>> reviews in the neutron-specs repository, then adding them makes sense too. >>> >> >> I don't believe this is the road we set ourselves on when we started the >> decomp/stadium. We wanted a clear separation of concerns and I don't see >> how going down this path is going to help us achieve that. >> >> I don't see the grounds to have such an abrupt change in direction right >> now, especially for the level of work that that would imply and the >> pressure that would put on the drivers team. Anyone is free to review and >> contribute where it matters for them, and location should not prevent them >> from doing so. >> >> > I was merely implying that since these projects are part of neutron, and > they have specs, keeping them in one place makes sense. And by doing that, > we'd need to give them +2 powers for their core reviewers. But, I'm fine > with leaving things the way they are and having them put their specs in > their devref. But we should update the devref in Neutron to reflect this, > e.g. that we don't expect specs in neutron-specs for things outside > [neutron, neutron-fwaas, neutron-lbaas, neutron-vpnaas]. > > IMO, it's pretty clear from here [1], which I revised in the context of [2]. Not sure if there's anything else that's left to misunderstanding. [1] http://docs.openstack.org/developer/neutron/policies/neutron-teams.html#neutron-specs-core-reviewer-team [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/237180/ > >>> >>>> We already started sending Kuryr spec to the Neutron repository and I >>>>> think it would make sense to manage it >>>>> as part of Neutron spec process. >>>>> >>>> >>>> No, unless what you are asking are changes to the core. Do you have a >>>> reference for me to look at? >>>> >>>> >>> See above, perhaps I answered this for you. >>> >> >>> >>>> >>>>> Any opinions on that? >>>>> >>>>> Gal. >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:10 PM, Armando M. <arma...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi folks, >>>>>> >>>>>> During revision of the Neutron teams [1], we made clear that the >>>>>> neutron-specs repo is to be targeted by specs for all the Neutron >>>>>> projects >>>>>> (core + *-aas). >>>>>> >>>>>> For this reason I made sure that the neutron-specs-core team +2 right >>>>>> was extended to all the core teams. >>>>>> >>>>>> Be mindful, use your +2 rights with care: if you are core on a *-aas >>>>>> project, you should exercise that vote only for specs that pertain the >>>>>> project you're core of. >>>>>> >>>>>> If I could use this email as a reminder also of the core hierarchy >>>>>> and lieutenant system we switched to in Liberty ([3]): if you have been >>>>>> made core by a lieutenant of a sub-system, please use your +2/+A only >>>>>> within your area of comfort and reach out for help if in doubt. >>>>>> >>>>>> Reviews are always welcome though! >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Armando >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/237180/ >>>>>> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/314,members >>>>>> [3] >>>>>> http://docs.openstack.org/developer/neutron/policies/neutron-teams.html#core-review-hierarchy >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> __________________________________________________________________________ >>>>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>>>>> Unsubscribe: >>>>>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Best Regards , >>>>> >>>>> The G. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> __________________________________________________________________________ >>>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>>>> Unsubscribe: >>>>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> __________________________________________________________________________ >>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>>> Unsubscribe: >>>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> __________________________________________________________________________ >>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>> Unsubscribe: >>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>> >>> >> >> __________________________________________________________________________ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: >> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev