As an alternative, to be considered to cleaned up, note that octavia, also a 
neutron stadium project, puts its specs in its own repo, runs its own doc jobs, 
etc. Pros and cons, but just pointing out that its out there.

Thanks,
doug


> On Oct 22, 2015, at 2:47 AM, Kyle Mestery <mest...@mestery.com> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Armando M. <arma...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:arma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> 
> On 21 October 2015 at 10:29, Kyle Mestery <mest...@mestery.com 
> <mailto:mest...@mestery.com>> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Armando M. <arma...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:arma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> 
> On 21 October 2015 at 09:53, Kyle Mestery <mest...@mestery.com 
> <mailto:mest...@mestery.com>> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Armando M. <arma...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:arma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> 
> On 21 October 2015 at 04:12, Gal Sagie <gal.sa...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:gal.sa...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Do we also want to consider Project Kuryr part of this?
> 
> No, why would we?
>  
> The reason to consider it is because Kuryr is a sub-project of Neutron, and 
> they are doing their spec submissions following the Neutron guidelines. 
> Adding the kuryr-core gerrit group to be on part with the *aas repos makes 
> sense here. If other sub-projects (like L2FW, SFC, etc.) start doing spec 
> reviews in the neutron-specs repository, then adding them makes sense too.
> 
> I don't believe this is the road we set ourselves on when we started the 
> decomp/stadium. We wanted a clear separation of concerns and I don't see how 
> going down this path is going to help us achieve that.
> 
> I don't see the grounds to have such an abrupt change in direction right now, 
> especially for the level of work that that would imply and the pressure that 
> would put on the drivers team. Anyone is free to review and contribute where 
> it matters for them, and location should not prevent them from doing so.
>  
> I was merely implying that since these projects are part of neutron, and they 
> have specs, keeping them in one place makes sense. And by doing that, we'd 
> need to give them +2 powers for their core reviewers. But, I'm fine with 
> leaving things the way they are and having them put their specs in their 
> devref. But we should update the devref in Neutron to reflect this, e.g. that 
> we don't expect specs in neutron-specs for things outside [neutron, 
> neutron-fwaas, neutron-lbaas, neutron-vpnaas].
>  
> 
> IMO, it's pretty clear from here [1], which I revised in the context of [2]. 
> Not sure if there's anything else that's left to misunderstanding.
> 
> 
> I think this [1] helps to make it 100% clearer, at least to me.
> 
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/238190 <https://review.openstack.org/238190>
>  
> [1] 
> http://docs.openstack.org/developer/neutron/policies/neutron-teams.html#neutron-specs-core-reviewer-team
>  
> <http://docs.openstack.org/developer/neutron/policies/neutron-teams.html#neutron-specs-core-reviewer-team>
> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/237180/ 
> <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/237180/>
> 
>  
>  
> We already started sending Kuryr spec to the Neutron repository and I think 
> it would make sense to manage it
> as part of Neutron spec process.
> 
> No, unless what you are asking are changes to the core. Do you have a 
> reference for me to look at?
>  
> See above, perhaps I answered this for you.
>  
> 
> Any opinions on that?
> 
> Gal.
> 
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:10 PM, Armando M. <arma...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:arma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hi folks,
> 
> During revision of the Neutron teams [1], we made clear that the 
> neutron-specs repo is to be targeted by specs for all the Neutron projects 
> (core + *-aas).
> 
> For this reason I made sure that the neutron-specs-core team +2 right was 
> extended to all the core teams.
> 
> Be mindful, use your +2 rights with care: if you are core on a *-aas project, 
> you should exercise that vote only for specs that pertain the project you're 
> core of.
> 
> If I could use this email as a reminder also of the core hierarchy and 
> lieutenant system we switched to in Liberty ([3]): if you have been made core 
> by a lieutenant of a sub-system, please use your +2/+A only within your area 
> of comfort and reach out for help if in doubt. 
> 
> Reviews are always welcome though!
> 
> Cheers,
> Armando
> 
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/237180/ 
> <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/237180/>
> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/314,members 
> <https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/314,members>
> [3] 
> http://docs.openstack.org/developer/neutron/policies/neutron-teams.html#core-review-hierarchy
>  
> <http://docs.openstack.org/developer/neutron/policies/neutron-teams.html#core-review-hierarchy>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe 
> <http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev 
> <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best Regards ,
> 
> The G. 
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe 
> <http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev 
> <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe 
> <http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev 
> <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe 
> <http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev 
> <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe 
> <http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev 
> <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe 
> <http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev 
> <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe 
> <http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev 
> <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org 
> <mailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org>?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev 
> <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to