> On 09 Nov 2015, at 21:57, Tim Hinrichs <[email protected]> wrote: > > Congress happens to have the capability to run a script/API call under > arbitrary conditions on the state of other OpenStack projects, which sounded > like what you wanted. Or did I misread your original question? > > Congress and Mistral are definitely not competing. Congress lets people > declare which states of the other OpenStack projects are permitted using a > general purpose policy language, but it does not try to make complex changes > (often requiring a workflow) to eliminate prohibited states. Mistral lets > people create a workflow that makes complex changes to other OpenStack > projects, but it doesn't have a general purpose policy language that > describes which states are permitted. Congress and Mistral are > complementary, and each can stand on its own.
+1 __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
