> On 10 Nov 2015, at 21:29, Renat Akhmerov <rakhme...@mirantis.com> wrote: > > >> On 09 Nov 2015, at 21:57, Tim Hinrichs <t...@styra.com> wrote: >> >> Congress happens to have the capability to run a script/API call under >> arbitrary conditions on the state of other OpenStack projects, which sounded >> like what you wanted. Or did I misread your original question? >> >> Congress and Mistral are definitely not competing. Congress lets people >> declare which states of the other OpenStack projects are permitted using a >> general purpose policy language, but it does not try to make complex changes >> (often requiring a workflow) to eliminate prohibited states. Mistral lets >> people create a workflow that makes complex changes to other OpenStack >> projects, but it doesn't have a general purpose policy language that >> describes which states are permitted. Congress and Mistral are >> complementary, and each can stand on its own. > > +1 >
Btw, that Congress action can be calling Mistral to start a workflow. Renat Akhmerov @ Mirantis Inc. __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
