Randall R Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> さんは書きました: > Felix, > > On Friday 27 October 2006 09:30, Felix Miata wrote: >> ... >> >> > <http://64.142.14.4/~rschulz/font-verdana.6-10pt.SuSE10.0.png> >> > <http://64.142.14.4/~rschulz/font-verdana.6-10pt.SuSE10.2b1.png> >> > >> > I picked Verdana for this test, though it does not show as stark a >> > difference as some fonts I use routinely. >> > >> > ... >> >> I find the vastly superior kerning of the latter overwhelms any other >> difference there might be. > > For me the sharpness of the 10.0 (and 10.2Alpha5) is by far the > overriding factor. I need to use small fonts when programming and in > general want to get as much textual information on the screen as > possible.
Then use the byte code interpreter. The rendering with the byte code interpreter for Verdana is even sharper than your first screen shot. Really. Most likely I will make rendering with the byte code interpreter the default for certain list of fonts where it obviously gives superior results. -- Mike FABIAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.suse.de/~mfabian 睡眠不足はいい仕事の敵だ。 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
