On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 10:52 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Sun, 2 Sep 2007, Francis Giannaros wrote: > > > On 9/2/07, Bernhard Walle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > * Alberto Passalacqua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-09-02 17:52]: > > > > during a discussion on IRC it emerged that GNOME still has a very high > > > > number of blockers and critical bugs. > > > > > > GNOME will be updated before release. > > > > Perhaps you could clarify what this means? Is it hoped that the > > updates and final release will solve all the 200+ bugs? The only > > reason I ask about this is because I notice around the place the > > general sense from some users of neglect for GNOME in openSUSE, which > > I know is certainly as a statement unfair; but I can see why some of > > them might question things when you take a look at comparative figures > > like this (GNOME 200+ with a lot of blockers, KDE just 64, and dealing > > with a web browser). > > > > It would be a real shame to have GNOME slip behind as it did in 10.2 > > which I think everyone will agree was not ideal. > > I suppose for the quality of GNOME it would be more helpful if people > would report issues upstream. At least if the perception is correct > that bugs in openSUSE GNOME are only fixed by pulling new releases > from upstream.
That perception is not accurate. Although we are tracking some of these bugs upstream and taking the fixes from the upstream release as they become available. -Gary --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
