On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 11:06:22AM +0200, Frank Sundermeyer wrote: > The table I have used to position the two columns is within the content > part. My fear is that if we use CSS to position the columns, the > content layout will no longer be independent from then template layout. > But maybe I am wrong here.
That should not be the case. http://www.csszengarden.com/ should be a reference that layout is perfectly possible using only css. However I am not into details with MediaWiki, so it could be that there are some strange things that they do, or that extra hacking is needed when an update arrives. <snip> > Using a table (not nested tables, of course) is sometimes much easier. It is easier when you want to stick to one design for always. Changing later is easier when done without tables. Editing the website in the end is, in my experience, easier with css. -- houghi Always listen to experts. They'll tell you what can't be done, and why. Then do it. -- Heinlein : Time Enough For Love --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
