Private message sent to a bug author - mine was a dupe. It was been partially edited for understandable reasons Scott OMG its morning 08:08 GMT+10 Quote
With respect to the above bug, I also raised the same issue after I installed 10.2 when it was first installed by me and my bug was duped as created on 2007-01-02 however yours was created on 2006-11-16. I feel there are a few things about the whole in personnel who are involved in development. Looking at how hard you have had to battle, as I often need to, just to get an acknowledgement that there is a bug. Is an issue by itself. The possibility that almost all needinfo comments are commonly buck passing or offensive attitude back to the author often prevails; I have almost given up. I don't know if its a conflict cultural exchange, but its always an uphill battle. If you look at a recent survey of the huge number of users 86% aprox. with development/application testing/fault rectification type experience it is easy to see when asked that only 6.8% were willing to raise a bug report. With respect to this current bug labelling it as a enhancement "current classification" is insulting. The expected standard of the work from mostly paid workers at suse.de is from a development point of view, unacceptable. Years ago if I speced a new Functional Change or Trouble report and finished testing it and put it online and it fell over or was not 98% sound, I would have to justify my job if it happened too much. Those were different times, I was dealing with an enormous Mainframe with Global fingers attached and you were expected to perform. Sorry to have a twinge in your year directly, but for what its worth, just getting this very small, but significant bug fixed has been a huge effort on your behalf, lest a battle and I thank you for making the software just a little better. I have lost so much faith in suse.de I could open aprox 10 "serious" bug reports right now, but to tell you the truth - I don't want to have to battle and deal with attitude. No one ever says thanks to us bug finders but in this particular bug Thanks for you (correct) belief and you got 1 out of over 1000 bugs open still in 10.2. Unquote Alexey Eremenko wrote: > hi all ! > > Why are Novell guys closing perfectly valid bugs as WONTFIX ? > They should stop being lazy all the day. That is not a feature-request > but a bug. > The lazy number one is: marcio ferreira and Stefan Hundhammer > > link: > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=264716 > > What's worse is that they tell me something like: "If you do that > again I will formally ask a certain account of bugzilla to be > canceled." > > How am I supposed it eat that as a community-member ? >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
