On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 02:03 +0100, Carlos E. R. wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > The Thursday 2007-12-20 at 14:31 -0600, Bryen wrote: > > >> Unless of course that solution destroys the performance on the target > >> system. I am the one who started this thread, and as I stated at the > >> beginning, I have a dual core Turion L52 64bit processor, 1.5Gigs of > >> memory and a 7200 RPM Sata drive, and the performance went out the > >> door. Other than a large MBox in my Thunderbird, I don't have that > >> much data to index, and Beagle took 700Meg or RAM and 1Gig of SWAP, > >> niced or not, that causes a lot of swapping. > >> > > > > I think a bigger and more appropriate question is to determine WHY your > > performance is degraded. > > Don't you see why it is degraded? It is obvious: his beagle used 700 MB of > RAM and 1GB of swap. > > That's a software problem, a bug in beagle eating that much memory and > causing swapping. Not a hardware problem at all. Or are you saying that in > order to use beagle he should buy 2 Gigs more? > > - -- > Cheers, > Carlos E. R.
I'm saying I'm running it on my primary box with only 640MB RAM, 1 GIG swap and I have no performance issues whatsoever. So, the fact that hardware was discussed before I made my comment, it was to emphasize that the hardware issue is probably moot. Somewhere there's a configuration issue. And it ain't a common issue on every machine, so the point is, instead of bashing Beagle as a problem for everyone, let's focus on why its a problem for SOME people and not others. Then we can get to the root of the problem. -- ---Bryen--- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
