On Sun, 2007-12-23 at 23:10 +0100, Anders Johansson wrote: > On Sunday 23 December 2007 22:43:24 Hans Witvliet wrote: > > If you are not in control of your network, use openswan or strongswan > > for vpn, and put nfs-v3 over it. We have been using it in a test for > > connecting several locations. Works ok. > > huh? You're connecting each client to the server using vpn on the *local LAN*? > > That doesn't sound like a very good configuration > > nfs4 + kerberos gives authentication and encryption and requires very little > in the way of configuration. No offense, but VPN on a local LAN is just silly >
Well, at my work they're rather paranoid. For some, we have to tunnel internet through the corporate network, For others, we tunnel our corporate network with voip over public networks. Indeed, sounds odd, it is odd, but true. NFS4 is still on my "to investigate" list hw -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
