Hans Witvliet wrote:
On Sun, 2007-12-23 at 23:10 +0100, Anders Johansson wrote:
On Sunday 23 December 2007 22:43:24 Hans Witvliet wrote:
If you are not in control of your network, use openswan or strongswan
for vpn, and put nfs-v3 over it. We have been using it in a test for
connecting several locations. Works ok.
huh? You're connecting each client to the server using vpn on the *local LAN*?
That doesn't sound like a very good configuration
nfs4 + kerberos gives authentication and encryption and requires very little
in the way of configuration. No offense, but VPN on a local LAN is just silly
Well, at my work they're rather paranoid.
For some, we have to tunnel internet through the corporate network,
For others, we tunnel our corporate network with voip over public
networks.
Indeed, sounds odd, it is odd, but true.
That's standard practice in up-to-date IT departments.
NFS4 is still on my "to investigate" list
It's not a big deal.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
