On Sunday 23 December 2007 23:22:58 James Knott wrote: > Anders Johansson wrote: > > On Sunday 23 December 2007 22:43:24 Hans Witvliet wrote: > >> If you are not in control of your network, use openswan or strongswan > >> for vpn, and put nfs-v3 over it. We have been using it in a test for > >> connecting several locations. Works ok. > > > > huh? You're connecting each client to the server using vpn on the *local > > LAN*? > > > > That doesn't sound like a very good configuration > > > > nfs4 + kerberos gives authentication and encryption and requires very > > little in the way of configuration. No offense, but VPN on a local LAN is > > just silly > > > > Anders > > Unless you want to guard against packet sniffing.
Why would one encryption be better than another in that case? Anders -- Madness takes its toll -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]