> You might not like Anders for the changes he made
> without asking, but this this stubbornness is pretty
> sickening.

I have been wathing this arguing and disagreements with Pat and Maurice
silently over the weeks. For me, it seems like Webwork is going out of
hand (or nothing is happening) (developers don't know what to do, and if
they have an idea, they cannot implement it). Also, you promote that
WebWork is View Independent. Why most of these conversations here are
about JSP taglibs? I still think that JSP and most importantly taglibs
suck (with capital s of course), YMMV.

What was good about these discussions, was the fact that someone pointed
me to Maverick. It's a whole lot cleaner and simpler to understand and
extend than WebWork, so I go with it.

Whether these discussions are good for WebWork's development and future,
for me they didn't look very good. Actually they throw me away from
using WebWork, :-( - I'm not interested in wathing these fights go on
and on, only because two main developers disagree on almost every
aspect.

Patrick:

I think you have great ideas and much potential (and energy) to write
your own SquadWork and forget these ugly fights.

This was a response from community, but I only have one small vote. I'm
going to watch how you are going to proceed with WebWork and maybe I
come back when Xwork is ready for the prime time. Thanks for the
support! I still like WebWork (and your work), but I also like change,
and now it's time for a change, thought not very big one, because
Maverick is very similar.

And I do not have nothing to do with Maverick, I only discovered it last
week.

Peace
Aapo Laakkonen



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

Reply via email to