Why not just put Ant (v. whatever) in the README file as a requirement?
Most other OSS projects follow that convention for dependencies.

Michael Blake Day
Artistry Studios - e-commerce design, implementation and hosting
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
mobile: 770.480.1547


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Rickard Oberg
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 8:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Re: [Opensymphony-developers] Re: OpenSymphony
build process


The reasons I included build.bat and Ant in WebWork in the beginning was
mainly because:
1) Not everyone had Ant
2) There were different versions of Ant around (still are) and to make
sure that the right version was used, I included it in the project.

1) is maybe not an issue anymore, but 2) is. But maybe people don't
think 2) is too big of a deal.

/Rickard



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility
Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
http://hpc.devchannel.org/
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork





-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility 
Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
http://hpc.devchannel.org/
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

Reply via email to