Mike, Aren't you worried about the non-threadsafe PropertyEditor caching in the 1.3RC1 release?
I certainly was, which is why I made a patch for it that I submitted to the list (and Jira) last week. I have not heard much comments about it yet though. Is it ok to add this patch to CVS? If no committers have the time to do so, I would be glad to help out. (if given CVS access of course). I've also submitted two other minor patches to Jira that could be added (WW-101 and WW-102). It would be a shame if new users were scared away from Webwork because of the horribly bad performance in WW1.2.1, so for that reason it would be nice to have the 1.3 release soon. Cheers, Dick Zetterberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Cannon-Brookes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 6:00 AM Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Scope for 1.4 > Kirk, > > As a guide, we've been shipping code based on 1.3 for a few months now. And > yes, we use millions of UI tags ;) > > I agree with you in general though - talk of 1.4 is silly when 1.3 isn't out > yet! > > Cheers, > Mike > > ATLASSIAN - http://www.atlassian.com > Expert J2EE Software, Services and Support ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
