On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 04:20:52PM +0100, Rickard �berg wrote: > Simon Stewart wrote: > >Rickard, just a thought, but how much of the code in XWork is derived > >form (or at least, similar in principle to) your own AOP framework? I > >get the feeling that there could be a significant amount of overlap > >between the two in terms of configuration, interceptors, etc. > > Not a whole lot really. The XWork stuff is highly specialized for the > thing it does, whereas my AOP framework is totally generic. Some of the > configuration is similar, like packages and such, but still very very > different. I use runtime attributes a lot for configuration, which isn't > possible here (for example). > > The ideas are similar though.
How does nanning fit into xwork? (http://nanning.sf.net/) Nanning is a open source AOP library. IMHO the whole interceptor stuff in xwork can be modeled using nanning. -billy. -- Meisterbohne S�flinger Stra�e 100 Tel: +49-731-399 499-0 eL�sungen 89077 Ulm Fax: +49-731-399 499-9
msg01498/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
