Jira seems to be down still.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jason Carreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 2:59 AM
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Simplicity of WW2 - Practical ideas


I'm open to having a package-wide default action package which would be
appended to action class names. Did someone create that Jira issue yet?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2003 7:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Simplicity of WW2 - Practical ideas
>
>
> from an outsiders point of view.. i think i'd have to admit
> that requiring a proper classname everywhere would actually
> increase complexity.
> but it is nice to be able to think of actions by their name,
> it seems a but superfluous when you're constantly changing
> their names.. i like thinking of them as entities, jsut like
> i like to do in plain java code... an import sets the
> namespace or whatever. maybe the examples could use fully
> blown classnames to help the newbie. but why couldnt we have
> something like the prefix action proxy in ww1 as well? i like
> not having to depend on any tools to help me get the work
> done, and being to type it all out in plain text.. and i
> guess even copy-paste is a tool...
> those are my 2 cents..
>
> Ian Pojman
>
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 08:24:18AM +1000, Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote:
> > Anders,
> >
> > I have to say that this is a _bad_ idea.
> >
> > You can already test actions to setup xwork.xml - just
> instantiate the
> > object, call your setter methods and run!
> >
> > People doing J2EE understand XML, they have to. All descriptors are
> > XML. Xwork.xml is not _that_ complex for a hello world
> example, most
> > of the elements are optional.
> >
> > However, there _is_ a problem with WW2 at the moment that
> if a view is
> > not found, no debug page is shown. I think it should be ("action
> > returned "input" but not "input" view found).
> >
> > M
> >
> >
> > On 18/8/03 8:03 AM, "boxed" ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) penned the words:
> >
> > > I had a discussion on #java with Epesh, and he expressed the
> > > sentiment that WW2 might be turning into a too complex
> system which
> > > will alienate new users and be "popular with the
> gearheads and such
> > > when it leaves nerd-domain". After reading the responses to the
> > > "Simplicity in WW2" email I must agree that it looks like this.
> > >
> > > Now, to make me sound less like a whiner and more like
> someone with
> > > good ideas, here is a practical proposal:
> > >
> > > The way you have to declare each action in a rather complex XML
> > > config file before even rudimentary testing increases the
> > > learning-curve needlessly. I propose a few simple
> features that will
> > > help the average
> > > users:
> > >
> > > Actions can be run with the fully qualified class name.
> Actions map
> > > by default to
> > >   1. a view document with the name of the action.
> > >   2. if 1 fails, a debug document that displays a list of the
> > > exposed properties and their current value.
> > >
> > > This will cut the amount of explaining needed for a hello
> world type
> > > app down by an entire step. Anyone else got ideas like this that
> > > will cut down on the learning curve for newbies?
> > >
> > > Anders Hovmöller
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites
> > > including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are
> > > available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual
> > > Studio .NET.
> > >
> http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet
_072303_01/01
> > _______________________________________________
> > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
> Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
> Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
> http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_
> 01/01
> _______________________________________________
> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data
Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today
and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

Reply via email to