You can update the templates to do this... Check first for the property from the ValueStack, then check the params... Maybe we should make this default in the templates? Thoughts anyone?
> -----Original Message----- > From: Adam Fleming [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 12:49 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details > > > Hi, > > This is a problem I am having trouble with too (as I am sure many > others). How can you get the original input if the field you are > validating is not a String? Is this possible now with an > expression validator and something like > > request.getParam(myField) != null && request.getParam()... > > > -af > > > > Fred Lamuette wrote: > > Ok, you say "Type conversion handle this". But when will be planned > > that the user-defined converters add a field error (maybe with a > > specific Exception thrown as you said) ? Cheers. > > Richard. > > > > -----Message d'origine----- > > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > la part de > > Jason Carreira Envoye : samedi 27 septembre 2003 14:19 > > A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Objet : RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details > > > > > > You thought what I said was overcomplicated? This sounds WAY too > > complicated... Type conversion handles this... > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Fred Lamuette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 1:53 PM > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details > >> > >> > >>In fact, this way of thinking is overcomplicated. Why cant we add > >>another level of validation. > >> > >>Level 1 before ParamsInterceptor : > >> I validate the representation types of input parameters > >>(ActionContext.getContext().getParameters()) > >> For instance, a string represents really a date. > >> > >>Level 2 after ParamsInterceptor : > >> I validate the bean data. > >> For instance, date1 is not null, date1>date2, ... > >> > >>Any remarks ? > >>Cheers. > >>Richard. > >> > >>-----Message d'origine----- > >>De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>la part de Jason Carreira Envoye : vendredi 26 septembre > 2003 16:54 A > >>: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Objet : RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details > >> > >> > >> > >>>-----Original Message----- > >>>From: Fred Lamuette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > >>>My question : how can i do to see the message "Your text "Foo Bar" > >>>could not be parsed as a date", what can i do in my > >> > >>dateconverter to > >> > >>>add a FieldError ???? > >>> > >>>Cheers. > >>>Richard. > >> > >>Short answer: You can't > >>Long answer: You can't, yet... > >> > >>I'm trying to figure out if it's ok for you if we figure out how to > >>make the converter add a field error, but then the > >>RequiredFieldValidator is also going to add a message. > >> > >>I think we can do this with a custom runtime error... > >> > >>throw new XworkTypeConversionMessageException("Your text '" > + value + > >>"' could not be parsed as a date"); > >> > >>The type conversion framework can be made to catch this > exception type > >>and add the message from it to the field errors. > >> > >>Jason > >> > >> > >>------------------------------------------------------- > >>This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > >>Welcome to geek heaven. > >>http://thinkgeek.com/sf > >>_______________________________________________ > >>Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > >> > >> > >> > >>------------------------------------------------------- > >>This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > >>Welcome to geek heaven. > >>http://thinkgeek.com/sf > >>_______________________________________________ > >>Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > >> > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
